Find a company you can trust

Discover, read, and write reviews

What are you looking for?

Looking to grow your business?

Strengthen your reputation with reviews on Trustpilot.

Get started

Help millions make the right choice

Help millions make the right choice

Share your experience on Trustpilot, where reviews make a difference.

authenticationBanner/auth_banner_1-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_1-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_2-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_2-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_3-1.jpg
authenticationBanner/auth_banner_3-1.jpg

We’re Trustpilot

We’re Trustpilot

We’re a review platform that’s open to everyone. Our vision is to become the universal symbol of trust — by empowering people to shop with confidence, and helping companies improve.

Our new Trust Report has landed!

Find out which actions we’ve taken to protect you and promote trust on our platform.

Take a look
Trust Report image

Recent reviews

all al

all al

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This review specifically reflects my experience with the RoveLab Taiwan team and the local distributor/customer service team. If this is what the Taiwan team considers “normal quality,” then it is genuinely difficult to understand what quality standards are actually being applied in Taiwan. Before purchasing, I specifically traveled to Kaohsiung to see and try the sofa in person. I made the purchase only after confirming that I was satisfied with both the appearance and seating comfort of the showroom model. However, the product delivered to my home showed noticeable differences in seat height, inconsistent foam recovery, cushions that did not appear fully expanded, and a seating feel that was clearly different from the showroom model. Even after waiting beyond the recovery period recommended by the Taiwan team, the issues remained. Yet instead of carrying out a convincing objective inspection or providing clear technical criteria, the responses from the Taiwan customer service team continued to revolve around phrases such as “personal preference,” “product characteristics,” and “within the normal range.” My question has always been very simple: Does the product delivered to me actually meet the same quality standard represented by the product displayed and sold by RoveLab Taiwan? Unfortunately, I have still not received a convincing answer. What is especially frustrating is the way the Taiwan team handled the after-sales process. Rather than objectively verifying whether the product met the brand’s stated specifications, the issue was repeatedly reframed as a matter of my personal perception or preference. So if a customer receives a sofa that looks and feels noticeably different from the showroom model, but the sofa is still technically usable, does the Taiwan team simply consider that “normal”? Even more disappointing, my later follow-up messages to the Taiwan distributor/customer service team eventually received no further response. After paying this price for a product, I did not expect the customer to be the one repeatedly chasing the Taiwan team, documenting the issue, and trying to prove that there may be a product-quality problem, while the main response from the local team is simply that everything is “normal.” My concerns are not only about the consistency of the product quality, but also about the extremely passive way the Taiwan team has handled this case. Possible product defects have not been properly investigated, objective quality standards have not been clearly demonstrated, and communication has eventually stopped. If the official images, showroom model, and the actual product delivered to customers can differ this noticeably, and the Taiwan team can still explain everything as being “within the normal range,” then I would strongly recommend that customers in Taiwan think carefully before purchasing. At this point, my experience with the RoveLab Taiwan team deserves one star. Not because the product failed to match my personal preferences perfectly, but because the way the Taiwan team has responded to a legitimate product-quality concern has seriously damaged my trust in the brand.

Nora Díaz

Nora Díaz

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Wordscope is one of those tools that makes me want to tell everyone about it. It is incredibly well-rounded and easy to use, whether you are an experienced CAT tool user or completely new to this kind of software. It has all the essential features needed for a professional translation workflow, but it does not stop there. You can use it at a relatively simple, entry-level pace or take advantage of a much more advanced and powerful feature set as your needs evolve. In addition to working as a translator, I am also a technology trainer, and Wordscope is one of the tools I always mention in my training sessions. Whenever I demonstrate its machine translation engine integrations, access to public glossaries from within the platform, or its incredibly useful bank of ChatGPT prompts, which can be accessed with the click of a button, people are amazed by how thoughtfully designed the tool is. Another feature that distinguishes Wordscope from many other CAT tools is its flexibility for collaboration. Even as a freelance translator, you can share a project with an editor or reviewer. You can also divide a project among a group of translators. At the same time, you retain the flexibility to bring in your own resources, including translation memories and glossaries. One of the things I appreciate most about Wordscope is how approachable and responsive the developer is. They genuinely listen to users, and new features are continually being added in response to real requests. As a result, the platform keeps becoming more useful and better suited to the realities of professional translation work. Wordscope is a thoughtfully built, flexible, and continually evolving tool that I am very happy to recommend.